Evaluation grading standards
31/10/2019 Degree 5 Evaluation grading standards COURSEWORK 2019 15:58
L5 CW 100-90% 89-80% 79-70% 69-60% 59-50% 49-40% 39-30% 29-20% 19-10% 9-Zero%
Coherence, organisation of
project and a focus to
goal Robust logical organisation
and coherence enhances
fulfilment of the project
aims and with some
creativity. Robust logical organisation
and coherence enhances
fulfilment of the project
aims. Demonstrates logical
organisation and coherence. Demonstrates sound,
considerate organisation. Demonstrates typically sound,
typical organisation. Reveals passable
organisation. Restricted organisation that’s
partially comprehensible. Poorly offered and
structured. Very disorganised. Incoherent. 20%
Readability of expression (incl.
accuracy, spelling, grammar,
punctuation). Wonderful writing model
acceptable to the project.
Grammar and spelling
correct. Fluent writing model
acceptable to the project.
Grammar and spelling
correct. Language fluent. Grammar and
spelling correct. Language typically fluent.
Grammar and spelling primarily
correct. Which means clear, however language
not at all times fluent. Grammar
and/or spelling comprise errors. Usually comprehensible, however
language accommodates errors which
detract from the argument. Which means usually unclear and/or
frequent errors in grammar
and/or spelling. Which means unclear and/or
frequent errors in grammar
and/or spelling. Poor spelling, grammar and
punctuation. Exceptionally poor spelling,
grammar and punctuation.
Educational integrity. Honesty in
research; acknowledging and
giving credit score to work of
others; acceptable use of
referencing requirements for
self-discipline Sources used are
acknowledged within the textual content and
reference listing. Referencing is
right and follows a
systematic method
acceptable to the self-discipline.
All parts of particular person
references are current. Sources used are
acknowledged within the textual content and
reference listing Referencing is
right and acceptable to the
self-discipline. All parts of
particular person references are
current. Sources used are
acknowledged within the textual content and
reference listing and used to
help dialogue. Constant,
error free utility of
related referencing
conventions with nice
consideration to element. Sources used are
acknowledged within the textual content and
reference listing. Constant
utility of related
referencing conventions
acceptable to the self-discipline
with occasional
inconsistencies. Makes an attempt to observe systematic
method to the quotation of
sources, acceptable to the
self-discipline. Utility of
related referencing
conventions with minor
inconsistencies. Some try to cite sources
within the textual content however accommodates
inaccuracies, inconsistencies
and/or omissions. Usually
right utility of related
referencing conventions with
some errors. Citations of sources within the textual content
are inconsistent, inaccurate
and/or incomplete. Restricted
utility of referencing
conventions and/or errors. Citations of sources within the textual content
are inaccurate and/or
incomplete. Entries within the
reference listing are incomplete
and/or absent. No acknowledgement of
sources of knowledge in textual content
and/or reference listing. No acknowledgement of
sources of knowledge in textual content
and/or reference listing.
Consideration to goal /
content material and vary of
information and utilized to
activity Addresses the aim of the
project comprehensively
and imaginatively.
Demonstrates complete,
detailed and in-depth
information base, and a transparent
understanding of the bounds to
information. Addresses the aim of the
project comprehensively.
Demonstrates complete
detailed and in-depth
information base, with an
understanding of the bounds to
information. Addresses the complete goal of
the project successfully.
Demonstrates an in depth,
coherent, in-depth, information
base, with a growing
appreciation of the
provisional nature of
information. Addresses the complete goal of
the project successfully.
Demonstrates a far-ranging,
well-organised information
base, and a few appreciation
of the bounds of data. Demonstrates a sound factual
and/or conceptual information
base and makes use of acceptable
terminology. Proof of ample
information of subject and use of
acceptable terminology. Some related and/or
required information confused
or vital misuse of
terminology. Some related and/or
required information lacking
or confused and vital
misuse of terminology. Fails to handle the project
activity. Little or no related
information included. Fails to handle the project
activity. No related information
included. 40%
Use of literature / proof of
studying Proof of unbiased
studying. Clear, correct,
systematic utility of
high quality materials. Demonstrates
a growing capability to critically
appraise materials. Proof of unbiased
studying from a balanced
mixture of high quality major
and a few secondary sources.
Clear and correct utility
of fabric. Proof of unbiased
studying from high quality sources.
Clear, correct, systematic
utility of fabric. Proof of unbiased
studying from good high quality
sources. Literature
appropriately utilized. Proof of some unbiased
studying from acceptable
sources and utility of
literature. Proof of a slim vary of
studying from acceptable
sources. Literature is
offered in a descriptive manner. Restricted proof of studying or
inappropriate sources used
and/or engagement with the
literature very superficial. Very restricted proof of
studying from acceptable
sources. Little engagement with
acceptable sources. No engagement with
literature.
Synthesis: Data
gathering and processing Demonstrates a capability to
remodel summary
info, to assemble new
concepts to satisfy the evaluation
goal Data and ideas
offered in an modern
method to demonstate a full
understanding of the topic. Proof of capability to utilise
info processing
ideas acceptable to the
topic. Data is organised utilizing
acceptable constructions and
processes resulting in
identification of ideas to
meet evaluation goal. Collects, collates and
categorises info in a
structured method to meet
evaluation goal Partially collects, collates and
categorises info in an
try to satisfy evaluation
goal Data organisation lacks
construction, hindering fulfilment
of evaluation goal. Data organisation
detracts from the evaluation
goal. Restricted organisation of concepts /
info No organisation of knowledge 40%
Evaluation / Crucial reasoning Demonstrates a extremely
developed vital analysis
and evaluation of topic
materials. Arguments are clear,
coherent, credible and
show originality. Demonstrates a transparent grasp of
evaluation with well-developed,
vital analysis of topic
materials. Arguments are clear,
coherent and show
some originality. Makes efficient use of study
to develop vital considering
which is built-in into the
work. Arguments show
the power to judge topic
materials. Evaluation demonstrates vital
perception and a capability to
distinction different positions
close to principle. Makes truthful try at evaluation,
demonstrating typical
vital perception. Makes passable try at
evaluation with restricted vital
perception. Makes an attempt at evaluation with
restricted proof of vital
considering. Makes an attempt at evaluation
ineffective. Incoherent vital
considering. Lacks any evaluation. Insufficient
proof of vital considering Lacks any evaluation. No
proof of vital thought.
Reflection / utility to
apply / conclusion Crucial evaluation of private
and others’ contributions and
the rationale main to those.
Demonstrates imaginative
interested by potential
options and implications
for additional apply in a variety
of contexts. Conclusions effectively
developed and analytical. Critically analyses private
contribution and that of
others to apply. Considers
limitations to growing
acceptable plans of motion.
Conclusions effectively developed,
displaying vital perception with
strategies of future actions. Analyses private
contribution and that of
others to apply by way of
reflection. Considers affect of
future actions. Conclusions
effectively developed, displaying
perception drawn from the physique of
the work. Evaluates affect of private
contribution and that of
others to apply. Considers
future actions. Conclusions
developed logically in relation
to content material. Capable of consider affect on
apply and that of others
utilizing numerous frames of
reference. Identifies some
additional actions. Sound
conclusions clearly derived
from content material. Capable of interpret affect on
apply and that of others.
Sufficient conclusions are
drawn derived from content material Restricted interpretation of
affect on apply. Some
understanding of principle.
Restricted conclusion drawn from
content material. Ineffectual interpretation of
affect on apply. Ineffective
try to attract conclusion
from the content material. Incomplete interpretation of
apply implications. Restricted
try to attract conclusion. Insufficient interpretation of
apply implications. No
conclusion.
COHERENCE, ORGANISATION, ATTENTION TO ASSESSMENT PURPOSE AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
CONTENT – KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF LITERATURE
ANALYSIS, SYNTHESIS, CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
